tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post1376038112993354221..comments2023-09-26T06:15:36.105-07:00Comments on Scharlott's Beacon – casting light into darkness: Bscharlotthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06667913621618808338noreply@blogger.comBlogger29125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-43101802078298272292013-01-01T01:18:27.043-08:002013-01-01T01:18:27.043-08:00Just recently, Brad, I've been able to once ag...Just recently, Brad, I've been able to once again read the comments. I come here frequently to see if you have a new post up. Some of your theories I do not agree with (ears, etc.?), but that's o.k. I'm just glad you are still here and hoping you will keep this story alive.<br /><br />You know, there is that possibility (read the e-mail in my comment above) Sarah does have a birth certificate for Trig with her and Todd's names on it. If I'm right about this, it could be the reason no one will come forward. There's just no way to prove it. Not without a DNA test.<br /><br />Some commenters have said, "if she had a b/c, she'd show it." Maybe she did. She said she did but didn't say to whom. How can she show it now after so many of us know she faked her pregnancy. I'd sure like to know who signed the b/c. Was it Dr. CBJ? By the way, she did tell the ADN in a meeting with her attorney, that she delivered Trig. Just didn't say who from.<br /> <br />Recently, I saw where someone filed an FOI to have access to Suri Cruz's b/c. That's Tom's (?) daughter. Strangely, it was signed by a nurse who wasn't even present at the delivery.<br /><br />Well, Brad, everybody..."Have a Happy, Healthy New Year."<br /> Gingerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11214686482814006138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-39548720618500214072012-12-07T15:51:04.244-08:002012-12-07T15:51:04.244-08:00It's mind-boggling to think about the number o...It's mind-boggling to think about the number of people involved in the hoax (not to mention the number of $$$ and favors might have been paid out). The people mentioned here are only the tip of the iceberg.<br /><br />I can't help but - also too - think about the weight that would be lifted from the shoulders of the some of the "hoaxters" when this comes out.Everspringhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02431492305544073859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-33841434012545225642012-12-04T11:40:17.481-08:002012-12-04T11:40:17.481-08:00As am I. Very tight, simple, lots of visual imagin...As am I. Very tight, simple, lots of visual imaging, links and footnotes. Superb, Brad!KatieAnnieOakleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16958593736528021920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-20962025518562545562012-10-27T11:05:44.499-07:002012-10-27T11:05:44.499-07:00Hello Brad
This is a great comprehensive and well...Hello Brad<br /><br />This is a great comprehensive and well written summary. I really am sorry that I didn't read it earlier than now. <br /><br />Will be in touch. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07377165553662269155noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-4119434453121683162012-09-29T06:02:34.396-07:002012-09-29T06:02:34.396-07:00I am reading a 9/11 book by David Ray Griffen and ...I am reading a 9/11 book by David Ray Griffen and have learned about the many pilots and architects and physicists who have written into their professional journals questioning the anomalies of the official story. Also, these groups have started their own journals that question the anomalies. Too bad that more doctors and nurses who know the truth have not written into their professional journals questioning the miracle pregnancy and birth. My personal experience writing to governing bodies and AAFFP have been fruitless.<br />Also, had to change browser to use the new format, but can now read commetns.comeonpeoplenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-54939645869951994172012-09-25T22:19:07.688-07:002012-09-25T22:19:07.688-07:00It's great to see this recent post, Brad. Whe...It's great to see this recent post, Brad. When even a Palin apologist ("Blake") is acknowledging the Trig hoax, we can continue to hope that the truth will ultimately be revealed and Palin will be publicly shamed and shunned.<br /><br />Venefica Nigrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15925107852810040997noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-13707873443611343692012-09-23T04:21:51.308-07:002012-09-23T04:21:51.308-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Bscharlotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06667913621618808338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-73908480424548811692012-09-19T05:52:40.534-07:002012-09-19T05:52:40.534-07:00Meant to add that I am very happy to hear that you...Meant to add that I am very happy to hear that you have plans Brad.<br />You da man! I'm glad I decided to stop by here on my day off. You were silent for a while, but that perhaps means you are working working working on a "project"? comeonpeoplenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-87814403619157729462012-09-19T05:45:54.026-07:002012-09-19T05:45:54.026-07:00Oh go away. You sound like Krazy Kristy who is all...Oh go away. You sound like Krazy Kristy who is all over the blogs defending the indefensible. Kristy, you are wasting your time here and embarrasseing yourself. You make no sense and your endorsement of the hoax demonstrates that quite possibly that you're mentally ill. comeonpeoplenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-14043279177770716302012-09-19T05:37:13.096-07:002012-09-19T05:37:13.096-07:00This just gets mioe nauseating to read as time goe...This just gets mioe nauseating to read as time goes on. The stated actions of the doctor and hospital never happened, otherwise they would be out of a job and shut down. We were hoaxed. My hope is that as time goes on and Palin is no longer relevent, the blackout will drop and more people will be free to write about the hoax. It is plain as day and insulting to thinking people. The statute of limitations is up for the hospital and the doctor, so maybe soon there can be talk without fear of reprisal. It is very sad that the dcotr or hospital out at the onset of the hoax, as that was the time to break it open. The hoax was a perfect strom. happeneing in a far off land. If this was tried in the lower 48 I don't think it would have been blacked out. <br /> comeonpeoplenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-72771103392837354512012-09-18T10:51:28.133-07:002012-09-18T10:51:28.133-07:00Brad,
I know that you were trying "to write ...Brad,<br /><br />I know that you were trying "to write the story as tightly and comprehensively as possible" and I appreciate your efforts. But I found the "voice of God" email to be yet another fairly compelling piece of evidence, particularly the references to the "easy" pregnancy and "cutting it short" (w.r.t. the duration of the pregnancy) written six weeks before the due date. Might want to include that too?<br /><br />Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-7316664969526098212012-09-15T18:31:03.503-07:002012-09-15T18:31:03.503-07:00Ginger: Blake is not going to answer because s/he...Ginger: Blake is not going to answer because s/he seems to believe that SP was NOT Trig's birth mother and it doesn't matter: <br /><br />-- "Sure, a plus for many people who support (ed) Sarah Palin was her DS son. But how does finding out that she didn't birth him change that? Sure she referenced choosing life, but she's always chosen life in her biological kids. How does that change the fact that Trig's mother CHOSE life? (Blake, 10:24)"<br /><br />-- "A woman DID choose life, Sarah chose to support her by caring for her child. Why embarrass an unknown person who probably doesn't even know 'trig' is hers? (Blake, 10:31)"<br /><br />I'd sure like to know WHY Blake thinks SP is not the birth mother, esp since s/he doesn't acknowledge the facts that lead us to that conclusion (the letter you cite re insurance; the Mar 14 and other photos).<br /><br />I see Blake as saying it's common knowledge among his/her acquaintances that SP hoaxed us, but he thinks no one will much care if that is revealed in the MSM.<br /><br />I fear that Blake may be right -- that no one will care. Few will care to acknowledge the larger implications, like Blake. Others will choose to deny/ignore them to conceal their enabling of this national political hoax. <br /><br />That's how it's gone for the last 4+ years, anyway.<br /><br />Amy1https://www.blogger.com/profile/15250609551172928859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-85410434814353290892012-09-15T17:55:07.310-07:002012-09-15T17:55:07.310-07:00Blake, you state that there are "no hard fact...Blake, you state that there are "no hard facts." Well, I consider an e-mail from the State of Alaska, Benefits Div., addressed to..."Gov. Sarah Palin"...asking for her newborn's birth certificate, to be a hard fact. The e-mail is dated May 21, 2008. Let me print it below for you in case you haven't seen it and, perhaps, you can give us your interpretation of it:<br /><br />"Governor Palin~<br /><br />This is a reminder from the Benefits Section to let you know that, to date, we have not received the dependent verification documents for your new child.<br /><br />To ensure continued coverage for your newborn, please submit a copy of the child's Birth Certificate to us within 60 days of the date of birth. Claims submitted for your dependent child after this time period will be pended until this documentation has been received by the Benefits Section."<br /><br />Here are some of "my" thoughts I know you will be anxious to read:<br /><br />1) Since the e-mail was dated May 21, 2008, and they needed the b/c within 60 days, I think it was likely that 30 days had passed and they were giving her another 30 days to send it in. That ties in with Trig's announced birth date of around April 17/18, 2008.<br /><br />2) The e-mail is addressed to Sarah, and since it is from the Benefits Div., it looks like the claims/medical documents were in her name so she could use her insurance to pay for Trig's birth. How else could this be explained?<br /><br />3) Another significant point was the statement..."To ensure continued coverage for your newborn." That told me they had already been paying claims. In Alaska, pregnant state employee's newborns are covered for 72 hours after birth. Claims after that time period are not paid until they receive the newborn's b/c.<br /><br />4) Some have written this off by saying, "there is no evidence she sent in a b/c." That point is moot. They are sending her an e-mail for a reason and that reason is because they received claims for the birth of a newborn and his continued care. Period.<br /><br />I think the reason this e-mail has never received any traction, is because of the wide-spread rumor Bristol had a preemie in Jan./Feb., 2008. I've never found one shred of evidence she ever did but that's the consensus of everyone whose blogs I read. Maybe that's why it is ignored. <br /><br />So, Blake, tell us what you think of this e-mail and why it isn't a "hard fact."<br /><br />Thanks!<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Gingerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11214686482814006138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-2009329688106648562012-09-14T04:54:36.137-07:002012-09-14T04:54:36.137-07:00Grrr: Wow! Nice rebuttal of Blake's bizarre ra...Grrr: Wow! Nice rebuttal of Blake's bizarre ramblings. Bscharlotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06667913621618808338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-75050416925747538362012-09-14T04:01:48.248-07:002012-09-14T04:01:48.248-07:00"If that takes bloodshed, it will happen. Pre..."If that takes bloodshed, it will happen. Prepare ye selves."<br /><br />Your last statement invalidates everything that precedes it because it's the statement of a traitor to his or her country.<br /><br />Accepting the eventuality of, and even preparing for, "bloodshed" as a way to sort out our "grave ideological differences" is proof you have no faith in America or its government and are, therefore, demonstrably NOT a patriot. Violence by an angry -- and, if you're any example, completely misguided -- mob as a way to gain political power constitutes treason.<br /><br />Among those directly responsible for the increase in the number of dimwits like yourself who think armed insurrection is a viable option is Sarah Palin who fans your flaming idiocy with lies and misinformation.<br /><br />She's never ONCE proposed a workable, detailed solution to ANY of our country's problems, she's made not ONE positive contribution to the public discourse, and she's an expert ONLY in spewing inaccurate yet inflammatory word salad.<br /><br />When you say "Stuff like this happens daily in politics," are you including those speeches of hers which helped to INCREASE the risk to our elected officials' lives ? <br /><br />FACT: following her vile "palin' around with terrorists" campaign rhetoric, in November of 2008 the Secret Service issued a rare public statement announcing that her attacks on Barack Obama's patriotism were directly responsible for a spike in death threats made against him. <br /><br />And while we'll never know for certain just how much her "target" graphics and violent rhetoric contributed to Gabby Gifford's shooting, an ethical person's response would have been to ease up on such low tactics, not claim victimhood and "blood libel."<br /><br />It's unbelievable to me that you would come here and not only try to rationalize and obfuscate her unethical behavior, but also attempt to defend her against the mountain of documented evidence Dr. Scharlott has amassed and so clearly laid out above with nothing but mealy-mouthed, nonsensical drivel. <br /><br />You're as contemptuously serpent-tongued as Palin herself. If, as you claim, you are "not a newby" and "know how politics work," then you know that Palin's faked pregnancy had NOTHING whatsoever to do with saving the life of a DS kid and was merely a HOAX perpetrated SOLELY to burnish her political image and thereby win power.<br /><br />And if, as you say, a great many politicians are NOT as they portray themselves when in front of the cameras, that's reason to EXPOSE rather than justify their misdeeds.<br /><br />Todd Palin only pimped women. <br /><br />Congratulations on pimping his wife's divisive and destructive immorality.<br /><br />Grrrr!noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-11499098748827570952012-09-14T02:20:39.094-07:002012-09-14T02:20:39.094-07:00"She and her RW fundie colleagues seek to den..."She and her RW fundie colleagues seek to deny women choice, even for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest."<br /><br />Or even from an "accident" as the result of prostitution, a situation Todd Palin may have faced based on Shailey Tripp's documented account of him serving as her pimp. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-51749051235126409962012-09-13T12:19:35.794-07:002012-09-13T12:19:35.794-07:00Blake -- no need to ask you to explain the Mar 14 ...Blake -- no need to ask you to explain the Mar 14 flat-profile photo of SP, because you acknowledge TWICE that Palin DID hoax us -- was not the birth mother of Trig, as she claimed. The too-flat-profile Mar 14 photo is PROOF that Trig's birth was not as stated. <br /><br />But what makes YOU so certain SP did not give birth to Trig, hmmmmm?<br /><br />Sure, it's not a perfect world, and politicians lie all too often. Yes, the GOP/MSM cover-up (way more than the act) of this hoax is all too typical, and thus deserves to be uncovered if one cares about ethics and prefers to call candidates on blatant lies. <br /><br />Are you really saying that the Lion King presentation of a sedated, disabled, often sockless, child at every oppty, at all hours, is the same in the case of other candidates? <br /><br />Re your citing the "Life is a beautiful choice" quote, please note that Palin is ANTI-choice. She and her RW fundie colleagues seek to deny women choice, even for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest.<br /><br /><br />Amy1https://www.blogger.com/profile/15250609551172928859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-77721486704079120402012-09-13T10:31:48.203-07:002012-09-13T10:31:48.203-07:00In footage of the interior of the Heath home, ther...In footage of the interior of the Heath home, there is a picture hanging of Todd, Sarah and Trig with the words "Life...is a beautiful choice" printed besides them. How does that message change? A woman DID choose life, Sarah chose to support her by caring for her child. Why embarrass an unknown person who probably doesn't even know 'trig' is hers?<br /><br />And before you attack Bristol, until you discover of way of reading minds, you have no basis for comment on her as a person and her actions. use common decency.<br /><br />Look at it this way. If a person is willing to lie about a woman's son and his paternity, there's really no way of trusting anyone regarding any other information. Also notice that politicalgates purposefully avoids posting pictures showing T's uncanny resemblance as an infant to not only his oldest sister, but to her father, Todd Palin. <br /><br />Just things to consider when you're being fed blog hogwash.Blakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-34520697458287144602012-09-13T10:24:23.692-07:002012-09-13T10:24:23.692-07:00Brad, no, I cannot refute anything just like you c...Brad, no, I cannot refute anything just like you cannot prove anything. Why? No outsider knows anything of real substance. And considering some blogs' sources and their propensity to lie, I see nothing new as ever being discovered. My point wasn't to attack YOU personally and your blogs. I was referencing the closed-minded ones who refuse to believe anything other than what they believe. I find this silly considering how, as I've said, there are no hard facts. Too many people love to pick and choose information to feed their personal theories. That is a dangerous mode of operation in general. You have one lady who seems to change her beliefs with every new comment she reads, a couple people who blatantly ignore specific things just because they want to believe something is true.<br /><br /><br />Looking at things as objectively as humanly possible, what GOOD will this do if publicly revealed, even by Sarah? How will this ONE thing change things? Politicians will continue lying as that is how they ALL operate. Trig will still be apart of his loving family, as he is Sarah and Todd's son. Sure, more people than I expect MIGHT react for 2 seconds, but honestly, I really don't see much changing. <br /><br />Stuff like this happens daily in politics. Sure, a plus for many people who support (ed) Sarah Palin was her DS son. But how does finding out that she didn't birth him change that? Sure she referenced choosing life, but she's always chosen life in her biological kids. How does that change the fact that Trig's mother CHOSE life?<br /><br />I just don't see your side I guess.Trig will always be a cherished, happy little boy whom his family adores and values as a human. They will always see all human life as valued beings. <br /><br />Amy - not one political candidate leaves their families home. In local politics and national. Democrats awed at Obama's daughters on stage, in 08 and days ago. That is no different from Sarah Palin, 2006 or 2008. What her ADULT child chose to do publicly after the election is her choice, though notice she lived quite privately for almost a year before pursuing opportunities. The point is, these people have full lives away from the spotlight. Only 1 of her children chose to engage in some public events, though it was the one child who's been the most slandered and ridiculed out of double standard and hate. <br /><br />I am not a newby. I know how politics work. Some of my close friends have worked with the Obama campaign, the Clinton campaign and one was Michelle O's nanny. I would never ask them to betray confidence of their colleagues but just keep in mind that NO politician is how they appear on camera. I understand the forces behind both major parties and some of the motives. A lot is distorted. A lot is game-playing. There's LITTLE selflessness in politics at the national level and there's NO ONE who enters the field without a body of people offering them up as their front.<br /><br />What I know would probably overwhelm you so I will leave it at this: do not EVER take a candidate's words at face value and there will come a day where both parties will undergo needed transformations to accomodate all the people smartly rising up in resistance to both. We're at war with each other because a lot is at stake. There are grave ideological differences that need to be sorted out before any progress can be made. If that takes bloodshed, it will happen. Prepare ye selves. Blakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-3782888718033942192012-09-12T15:49:50.669-07:002012-09-12T15:49:50.669-07:00Thanks, Brad. And she continues with this obvious ...Thanks, Brad. And she continues with this obvious lie.She's irrelevant except to Fox viewers but the lie needs to be exposed to shut her hate down once and for all.Bill in Baltimorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09895038611238240550noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-50938136509712397462012-09-12T14:46:20.374-07:002012-09-12T14:46:20.374-07:00I agree with Blake that (1) most people are too bu...I agree with Blake that (1) most people are too busy to care, esp at this point; and (2) limiting the story to Sarah Palin is a plus.<br /><br />Re Point 2: SP is the only one whose arrangements legitimately concern us. She is the one who ran for office; although she dragged her family into it, that doesn't mean we need to. I say leave out Bristol, leave out speculation of Trig's bio-parents. The key thing for me is the unethical behaviors of Sarah Palin and those who enabled her hoax among the GOP VIPs and the RW fundie VIPs. <br /><br />Getting that uncovered is plenty enough for me, esp because all the rest will follow. But weighing down the basic story with all the details at the outset is overwhelming to a newby.Amy1https://www.blogger.com/profile/15250609551172928859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-15309057042404034952012-09-12T14:39:25.855-07:002012-09-12T14:39:25.855-07:00You write: "The only people who express stron...You write: "The only people who express strong feelings are the people who day in and day out fabricate these weird stories and tales regarding activities and anecdotes about this family."<br /><br />I've written 4,000+ words, plus footnotes above documenting the hoax. My research is scrupulous. Yet you don't challenge a single assertion with evidence or logic. You don't really believe I've fabricated anything -- if you did, you'd call me out on it with facts. All you have is empty words. Why bother? Bscharlotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06667913621618808338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-53928723737432373872012-09-12T13:53:26.885-07:002012-09-12T13:53:26.885-07:00Something that turns people away, other than the f...Something that turns people away, other than the fact that most Americans have lives too full to care about whether or not a beloved baby is the biological son of someone, is the odd and reaching argument that the child, who was obviously tiny when presented, is Bristol's. <br /><br />To people who do follow this, think about all the people who saw little "tiny" Trig from the beginning. Some might secretly question things, but youll be hardpressed to find people who actually care in Alaska. The only people who express strong feelings are the people who day in and day out fabricate these weird stories and tales regarding activities and anecdotes about this family. YOU'RE all the reason there are so many lies an confusion.<br /><br />Just step back and start looking at things objectively without emotion. You'll be happier and will think more clearly because of it. Blakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-80354123398390504692012-09-11T23:38:43.304-07:002012-09-11T23:38:43.304-07:00Bravo, Brad. Thanks for posting this. I've mis...Bravo, Brad. Thanks for posting this. I've missed you.Bnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762475984160052230.post-2665563107935590942012-09-11T22:13:26.467-07:002012-09-11T22:13:26.467-07:00I too agree with Floyd (and Jilly G and Anon, belo...I too agree with Floyd (and Jilly G and Anon, below): beautifully concise; so well written. Well footnoted. I'm glad you have plans for this! (Can't wait to learn what they are, so we can help, if possible!)<br /><br />I'd also like to add that the reason we care about this is not because it's a stray pregnancy or the innocuous cover-up of a private family matter but because it's a deliberate abd repeated lie, foisted upon the electorate in 2008 to demonstrate the "family values" of the GOP (proving only how bankrupt the GOP version of those values is), taking advantage of a disabled child to do so, aiming to sway an election via deceit. And the cover-up of this disgusting hoax implicates McCain, Schmidt, and other GOP VIPs in their silence that continues to this day about this unprecedented hoax.Amy1https://www.blogger.com/profile/15250609551172928859noreply@blogger.com